VAS capture & billing — every touch billed
Stage 5 · Warehouse & Transload
P1Expansion
Four-Lane View
Software Function
- ›VAS menu as scannable work orders: hand-off, forklift, clamp, palletization, shrink wrap/band, label, kitting Capture at point of work: scan pallet → select service → photo if required → billed Client-approved VAS price book; auto-invoice with evidence attached
Service Provider / Admin
- ›Zero end-of-month billing reconstruction — the leaked-revenue problem deleted VAS margin per client/service; labor standards per service
User — Driver / IOO
- ›Load-ready freight: wrapped, labeled, banded to spec — rejections at delivery drop
Customer — Client / FF / NVOCC
- ›Itemized VAS invoice with photo evidence — pays for what happened, sees what they paid for
Software Function
- ›VAS menu as scannable work orders: hand-off, forklift, clamp, palletization, shrink wrap/band, label, kitting Capture at point of work: scan pallet → select service → photo if required → billed Client-approved VAS price book; auto-invoice with evidence attached
Competitors
Camelot (best-in-class VAS billing, dated tech), Extensiv (billing exists, capture is manual), ShipHero (parcel DNA, no B2B VAS)
Differentiation
Industry-wide, VAS is performed on the floor and reconstructed at month-end — 5–15% leaks. Capture-at-the- touch makes billing a byproduct of work, not a project.
Make It Better
VAS revenue leakage to zero and invoice disputes near-zero — the margin line that funds the below- market space play.